The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-6124•United States of America v. Yagoub M. Mohamed, a/k/a Mohammed A. Yagoub
05-6124Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 23, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6124
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
YAGOUB M. MOHAMED, a/k/a Mohammed A. Yagoub,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District
Judge. (CR-01-177; CA-03-58-3)
Submitted: August 18, 2005 Decided: August 23, 2005
Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Yagoub M. Mohamed, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Ronald Hood, Assistant
United States Attorney, Gregg Robert Nivala, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia; Michael Calvin Moore,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Yagoub M. Mohamed appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to reopen the time to file an appeal of his
motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.
Mohamed, Nos. CR-01-177; CA-03-58-3 (E.D. Va. Jan. 11, 2005). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.