The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-6108•Anthony Leon Hoover v. Thomas J. Keith
05-6108Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 18, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6108
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THOMAS J. KEITH; PANSY D. GLANTOR,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
District Judge. (CA-04-1047)
Submitted: May 12, 2005 Decided: May 18, 2005
Before TRAXLER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Leon Hoover, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Leon Hoover seeks to appeal the district court’s
order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing
his complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) as frivolous under 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on
the reasoning of the district court. See Hoover v. Keith, No. CA-
04-1047 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 4, 2005). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.