The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-6063•Steven Levon Swint v. Joseph Brooks
05-6063Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 6, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6063
STEVEN LEVON SWINT,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
JOSEPH BROOKS,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (CA-04-341)
Submitted: April 28, 2005 Decided: May 6, 2005
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Steven Levon Swint, Appellant Pro Se. Debra Jean Prillaman,
Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Steven L. Swint appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Swint v. Brooks,
No. CA-04-341 (E.D. Va. Dec. 7, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal issues are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.