The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-6058•Stephen Shields v. Fairfax County Public Schools
05-6058Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 6, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6058
STEPHEN SHIELDS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
FAIRFAX COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS; CAROLYN
ROBINSON, Fairfax County Public Schools;
SHERMAN HARRISTON, Fairfax County Public
Schools; EMANUEL CALLOWAY, Fairfax County
Public Schools,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, Jr., District
Judge. (CA-04-631-2)
Submitted: April 28, 2005 Decided: May 6, 2005
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stephen Shields, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Stephen Shields appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Shields v. Fairfax County Pub. Sch., No. CA-04-631-2 (E.D. Va.
Dec. 10, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.