The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-6045•United States of America v. Mohammed Hammoude, a/k/a Mohammad Hammoudeh
05-6045Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 26, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6045
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MOHAMMED HAMMOUDE, a/k/a Mohammad Hammoudeh,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District
Judge. (CR-00-9-A)
Submitted: October 19, 2005 Decided: October 26, 2005
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mohammed Hammoude, Appellant Pro Se. Robert William Wiechering,
Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Mohammed Hammoude appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for termination of supervised release. We have
reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion or reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. See United States v. Hammoude, CR-00-9-A (E.D. Va. filed
Jan. 10, 2005; entered Jan. 12, 2005). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.