The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-6033•Feliberto Diaz v. JOHN DOE, Dr., Medical Administrator, Utilization Review Board
05-6033Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 27, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6033
FELIBERTO DIAZ,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN DOE, Dr., Medical Administrator,
Utilization Review Board; PHILLIP E. STOVER,
Dr., Medical Administrator, North Carolina
Department of Corrections,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,
District Judge. (CA-04-677-5-H)
Submitted: May 31, 2005 Decided: June 27, 2005
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Feliberto Diaz, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
*We note that, contrary to the district court’s calculations,
Diaz’s complaint was timely filed. We base our affirmance on the
alternative grounds cited by the court.
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Feliberto Diaz appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. * See Diaz v. Doe,
No. CA-04-677-5-H (E.D.N.C. Dec. 8, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.