The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-6010•Paul Graham v. State of Maryland
05-6010Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 31, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6010
PAUL GRAHAM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
STATE OF MARYLAND; DIVISION OF CORRECTIONS;
CENTRAL BOOKINGS INTAKE FACILITY; BALTIMORE
CITY DETENTION CENTER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.
(CA-04-3713-CCB)
Submitted: August 5, 2005 Decided: August 31, 2005
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul Graham, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Paul Graham appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that
this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on
the reasoning of the district court. See Graham v. Maryland, No.
CA-04-3713-CCB (D. Md. Dec. 7, 2004). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.