Marek Budnik v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d 475, 481 4th Cir. 2006 . Accordingly, we deny the

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2407
MAREK BUDNIK,
Petitioner,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A73-554-240)
Submitted: November 22, 2006 Decided: January 8, 2007
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Irena I. Karpinski, LAW OFFICES OF IRENA I. KARPINSKI, Washington,
D.C., for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney
General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Kristin K.
Edison, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Marek Budnik, a native of Poland and a citizen of
Germany, petitions for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (“Board”) affirming the immigration judge’s
order denying his motion to reconsider its prior order, which
denied his application for a waiver of inadmissibility under
section 212(h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. We have
reviewed the record and the Board’s order and find that the Board
did not abuse its discretion in affirming the decision of the
immigration judge. See 8 U.S.C.A. § 1229a(c)(6) (West 2005); 8
C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(2) (2006); Jean v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d 475, 481
(4th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for
the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Budnik, No. A73-554-
240 (B.I.A. Nov. 30, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED

-- 2 of 2 --