Clarence Moore v. Richmond Nursing Home

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2399
CLARENCE MOORE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RICHMOND NURSING HOME; BORIS T. SIMMONS,
Police Officer, 1312-6,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (CA-99-683)
Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 28, 2006
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clarence Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Michael Barnett, CITY
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
In this civil action, Clarence Moore appeals the district
court’s orders: (1) denying his motion to reopen, to “reinstate the
case in the same position as before dismissal,” and for a new
trial; and (2) denying his motion to file a supplemental answer.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Moore v. Richmond Nursing Home, No. CA-99-683 (E.D. Va.
Dec. 1, 2005; Dec. 9, 2005). We deny Moore’s pending motion to
supplement the record. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --