The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-2329•Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Milliet K. Lanham
05-2329Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 27, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2329
MASSACHUSETTS MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
MILLIET K. LANHAM,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-04-3868-WDQ)
Submitted: May 31, 2006 Decided: June 27, 2006
Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Scott B. Elkind, ELKIND & SHEA, Silver Spring, Maryland, for
Appellant. Nell B. Strachan, VENABLE, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Milliet K. Lanham appeals the district court’s orders
granting summary judgment against her in this civil action under
the Employee Retirement Income Security Act and denying her motion
to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Massachusetts Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Lanham,
No. CA-04-3868-WDQ (D. Md. Sept. 19 & Oct. 27, 2005). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.