The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-2321•Alvin R. Reed v. McI Worldcom Network Services, Incorporated
05-2321Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 26, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2321
ALVIN R. REED,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MCI WORLDCOM NETWORK SERVICES, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III,
District Judge. (CA-05-517-5)
Submitted: April 10, 2006 Decided: April 26, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alvin R. Reed, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Allen Sar, John Ellison
Branch III, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C.,
Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Alvin R. Reed appeals the district court’s order granting
MCI’s motion to dismiss his claim of disparate impact based on age,
pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C.
§§ 621-634 (2000) (ADEA). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Reed v. MCI Worldcom Network Servs., Inc.,
No. CA-05-517-5 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 17, 2005). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.