The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-2292•Kathleen R. Kirby v. Richmond Redevelopment
05-2292Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 15, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2292
KATHLEEN R. KIRBY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RICHMOND REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING AUTHORITY,
Section 8; U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District
Judge. (CA-04-791-REP-MHL)
Submitted: July 26, 2006 Decided: August 15, 2006
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kathleen R. Kirby, Appellant Pro Se. Kristen Marie Calleja,
Alexander Jones Brackett, Sr., MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Richmond,
Virginia; Robert P. McIntosh, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Kathleen R. Kirby appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing
her claims pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Kirby v. Richmond Redevelopment and Housing Authority, No.
CA-04-791-REP-MHL (E.D. Va. Sep. 28, 2005). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.