The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-2287•Beacher Ralph Coleman v. HYLER; STEVE SCHAAB; MARTY HUDSON, Trustees of the UMWA 1974 Pension Plan and Trust
05-2287Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 16, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2287
BEACHER RALPH COLEMAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MICHAEL HOLLAND; B. V. HYLER; STEVE SCHAAB;
MARTY HUDSON, Trustees of the UMWA 1974
Pension Plan and Trust,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, Chief District
Judge. (CA-05-8-1)
Submitted: May 31, 2006 Decided: June 16, 2006
Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carl E. McAfee, CARL E. MCAFEE, P.C., Norton, Virginia, for
Appellant. Glenda S. Finch, Deputy General Counsel, Carolyn O.
Dutrow, Assistant General Counsel, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Beacher Ralph Coleman appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment for Defendants in his action under the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Coleman v. Holland,
No. CA-05-8-1 (W.D. Va. Nov. 1, 2005). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.