Brynildson Barksdale v. Carroll Ann Owens

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2273
BRYNILDSON BARKSDALE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CARROLL ANN OWENS; MAGGIE FRADY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge.
(CA-04-21971-6)
Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 27, 2006
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brynildson Barksdale, Appellant Pro Se. Sherman Brook Fowler,
CARTER, SMITH, MERRIAM, ROGERS & TRAXLER, P.A., Greenville, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Brynildson Barksdale appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil complaint for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Barksdale v. Owens, No. CA-04-21971-6 (D.S.C.
Oct. 17, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --