The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-2244•Tyro R. Beatty v. SCOTT M. THOMAS, Official Capacity as OIC
05-2244Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 14, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2244
TYRO R. BEATTY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SCOTT M. THOMAS, Official Capacity as OIC;
MICHAEL A. JONES, individually as Director;
NAVSEA INACTIVE SHIP’S MANAGEMENT OFFICE;
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY; NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS
COMMAND HQ,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (CA-05-71-2-RAJ-TEM)
Submitted: June 28, 2006 Decided: July 14, 2006
Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tyro R. Beatty, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Richard Leonard,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Tyro R. Beatty appeals the district court’s orders
granting summary judgment to Defendants and dismissing his
employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Beatty v. Thomas, No. CA-05-71-
2-RAJ-TEM (E.D. Va. June 15 and Oct. 25, 2005). We deny Beatty’s
motion to expedite. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.