052241.U

05-2241Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 19, 2006

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2241
FRANK J. MASIARCZYK, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; FEDERAL BUREAU OF
INVESTIGATION, Office of Information and
Privacy; U.S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY; CENTRAL
INTELLIGENCE AGENCY; JOHN AND JANE DOES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief
District Judge. (1:04-cv-00085-IMK)
Submitted: June 15, 2006 Decided: June 19, 2006
Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frank J. Masiarczyk, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Edward
Johnston, United States Attorney, Helen Campbell Altmeyer, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Frank J. Masiarczyk, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his civil action brought under the Freedom of
Information Act and his subsequent motion for reconsideration. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Masiarczyk v. IRS, No. 1:04-CV-00085 (N.D.W. Va. Oct.
21, 2005); Masiarczyk v. IRS, No. 1:04-CV-00085 (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 3,
2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.