The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-2230•Daniel E. Heily v. United States Department of the Interior
05-2230Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 21, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2230
DANIEL E. HEILY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (CA-05-104-1)
Submitted: February 16, 2006 Decided: February 21, 2006
Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel E. Heily, Appellant Pro Se. R. Joseph Sher, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Daniel E. Heily appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his Freedom of Information Act case. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Heily v. United
States Dep’t of Interior, No. CA-05-104-1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 13, 2005).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.