The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-2221•James Hunter v. Howard County Housing Comm’n, No. CA-05-1953-WDQ D. Md. Oct. 5, 2005 . We deny…
05-2221Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 12, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2221
JAMES HUNTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
HOWARD COUNTY HOUSING COMMISSION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge.
(CA-05-1953-WDQ)
Submitted: March 29, 2006 Decided: April 12, 2006
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Hunter, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara McFaul Cook, County
Solicitor, Ellicott City, Maryland; Carol Saffran Brinks, HOWARD
COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Ellicott City, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
James Hunter appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment to Defendant in this civil action. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hunter v.
Howard County Housing Comm’n, No. CA-05-1953-WDQ (D. Md. Oct. 5,
2005). We deny Hunter’s “Motion to Appeal the Decision and
Petition for Stay” and his “Motion for Summary and/or Default
Judgment.” Finally, we dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.