The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-2191•FAYEGH JADALI, M.D., Ph.D v. Alamance Regional Medical Center, Incorporated
05-2191Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 21, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2191
FAYEGH JADALI, M.D., Ph.D,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ALAMANCE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER,
INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
District Judge. (CA-04-214-1)
Submitted: February 16, 2006 Decided: February 21, 2006
Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Fayegh Jadali, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Douglas Dellinger,
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Charlotte, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Fayegh Jadali appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing
his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Jadali v. Alamance Regional Med. Ctr., Inc.,
No. CA-04-214-1 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 22, 2005). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.