The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-2185•Jeffrey Thomas Farmer v. Hayden; National Security Agency
05-2185Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 24, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2185
JEFFREY THOMAS FARMER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MICHAEL V. HAYDEN; NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District Court
of Columbia, at Washington, D.C. James Robertson, District Judge.
(05-MC-314-JR)
Submitted: January 19, 2006 Decided: January 24, 2006
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeffrey Thomas Farmer, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Jeffrey Thomas Farmer filed a notice of appeal in the
District Court for the District of Columbia and requested the
appeal be transferred to this Court. Because Farmer is not
appealing a final order or judgment emanating from a court over
which this court has jurisdiction, we are without jurisdiction.
Accordingly, we deny Farmer’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis
and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.