UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. JERRY A. HURST v. Northrop Grumman Corporation

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2166
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. JERRY A.
HURST,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Party-in-Interest.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District
Judge. (CA-04-1205-1)
Submitted: February 23, 2006 Decided: February 28, 2006
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerry A. Hurst, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Arthur Umayam, Deneen J.
Melander, FRIED, FRANK, HARRIS, SHRIVER & JACOBSON, LLP,
Washington, DC, for Appellee.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Jerry A. Hurst appeals from the district court’s orders
dismissing his complaint as filed beyond the limitations periods
and on res judicata grounds, and denying his motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Hurst v. Northrop Grumman Corp., No. CA-
04-1205-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 17, 2005 & filed Sept. 15, 2005; entered
Sept. 16, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --