L. R. Wright v. Transportation Security Administration

05-2157Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 28, 2006

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2157
L. R. WRIGHT; GARY WRIGHT,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (CA-05-1048-1)
Submitted: February 23, 2006 Decided: February 28, 2006
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
L. R. Wright, and Gary Wright, Appellants Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
L. R. Wright and Gary Wright appeal the district court’s
order dismissing their complaint without prejudice for failing to
state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2000). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Wright v.
Transportation Security Admin., No. CA-05-1048-1 (E.D. Va. filed
Sept. 30, 2005, entered Oct. 3, 2005). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.