The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-2155•052155.U
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2155
WILLIAM E. BURKE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THE ROCHESTER CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, District
Judge. (CA-04-37-3)
Submitted: April 28, 2006 Decided: June 1, 2006
Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert P. Dwoskin, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellant.
Charles E. McDonald, III, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART,
P.C., Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
William E. Burke appeals the district court’s order
rejecting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing
his employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See Burke v. The Rochester Corp.,
No. CA-04-37-3 (W.D. Va. Sept. 27, 2005). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.