The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-2153•052153.U
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2153
CORNELIA MORRIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General; UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
DARRYL GARNER,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. Wallace W. Dixon,
Magistrate Judge. (CA-04-858)
Submitted: May 5, 2006 Decided: June 5, 2006
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cornelia Morris, Appellant Pro Se. Joan Brodish Binkley, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 2 of 3 --
*The parties consented to jurisdiction of the magistrate judge
under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Cornelia Morris appeals the magistrate judge’s order
granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss her civil action. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge.
See Morris v. Potter, No. CA-04-858 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 2005).* We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.