Dale E. Brum, individually, and on behalf of all persons similarly situated v. Palattella; Jimmy Martin; Leland Robert Tanner

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2143
DALE E. BRUM, individually, and on behalf of
all persons similarly situated;
Plaintiff - Appellant,
TIMOTHY A. FITTRO,
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
JAMES FOUGHT; LARRY B. SUTPHIN, JR.; BRIAN L.
WEAVER; MICHAEL P. LEGGETT; RANDALL T.
RENALDO; DUANE E. ANDERSON; BERNARD R. BARLEY,
JR.; PATRICK V. PALATTELLA; JIMMY MARTIN;
LELAND ROBERT TANNER,
Intervenors/Plaintiffs,
versus
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Joseph Robert Goodwin,
District Judge. (CA-04-1014-6)
Submitted: May 16, 2006 Decided: May 18, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dale E. Brum, Timothy A. Fittro, Appellants Pro Se. Charlene Ann
Vaughan, Deputy Attorney General, John C. Krivonyak, William P.
Jones, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston,
West Virginia.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Dale E. Brum and Timothy A. Fittro appeal the district
court’s order dismissing Brum’s civil action challenging West
Virginia’s domistic relations law and policy regarding child
custody and child support. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Brum v. West Virginia, No. CA-04-1014-6
(S.D.W. Va. Sept. 13, 2005). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --