Nathaniel Barnes v. South Carolina Department of Transportation

05-2141Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 21, 2006

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2141
NATHANIEL BARNES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.
(CA-03-2296-3)
Submitted: February 16, 2006 Decided: February 21, 2006
Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donald Gist, DeAndrea Gist Benjamin, GIST LAW FIRM, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellant. Vance J. Bettis, GIGNILLIAT, SAVITZ &
BETTIS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Nathaniel Barnes appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief in this civil action. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of
the district court. See Barnes v. South Carolina Dep’t of Trans.,
No. CA-03-2296-3 (D.S.C. Sept. 16, 2005). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.