The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-2130•Louise Redditt v. Patricia Wade
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2130
LOUISE REDDITT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
DOMINIQUE HOLLIS, Louise Redditt, legal
guardian; DENEISHA HOLLIS, Louise Redditt,
legal guardian,
Plaintiffs,
versus
PATRICIA WADE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (CA-02-1275-1)
Submitted: April 12, 2006 Decided: May 4, 2006
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Louise Redditt, Appellant Pro Se.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Louise Redditt appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) against
Defendant Patricia Wade for failure to effect service within 120
days from the filing of the complaint. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Redditt v. Wade, No.
CA-02-1275-A (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 23, 2005). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.