The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-2129•Earl T. Scroggins, Jr v. SHANNON SEPOULVA, Fredericksburg Division Probation
05-2129Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 18, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2129
EARL T. SCROGGINS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SHANNON SEPOULVA, Fredericksburg Division
Probation and Parole; RON CAVANAUGH,
Fredericksburg Division Probation and Parole,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District
Judge. (CA-05-979)
Submitted: May 16, 2006 Decided: May 18, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Earl T. Scroggins, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Earl T. Scroggins, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Scroggins v. Sepoulva, No. CA-
05-979 (E.D. Va. Sept. 16, 2005). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.