The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-2085•Eugene Jamison, Sr v. Federal Communications Commission
05-2085Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 25, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2085
EUGENE JAMISON, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge.
(CA-05-2311-JFM)
Submitted: May 18, 2006 Decided: May 25, 2006
Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eugene Jamison, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Eugene Jamison, Sr., appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Jamison v. Federal Commc’n Comm’n, No.
CA-05-2311-JFM (D. Md. Aug. 25, 2005). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.