The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-2079•Joseph N. Briggs v. CITY OF ASHEVILLE, Police Department
05-2079Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 27, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2079
JOSEPH N. BRIGGS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CITY OF ASHEVILLE, Police Department; BUNCOME
COUNTY SHERIFF,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg,
District Judge. (CA-05-73-1)
Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 27, 2006
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph N. Briggs, Appellant Pro Se. Curtis W. Euler, CITY
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Asheville, North Carolina; Julie M. Kepple,
BUNCOMBE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, Asheville, North Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Joseph N. Briggs appeals the district court’s order
denying his Motion for Final Execution and Order to Preclude Exempt
Property Rights. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Briggs v. City of Asheville, No. CA-05-73-
1 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 1, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.