The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-2042•Gary D. Bean v. United Parcel Service, Incorporated
05-2042Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 14, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2042
GARY D. BEAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA-
04-2213-DKC)
Submitted: May 9, 2006 Decided: June 14, 2006
Before WILKINS, Chief Judge, and KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David A. Branch, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Emmett F. McGee,
Jr., Paul A. Mallos, DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY US, L.L.P.,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Gary D. Bean appeals a district court order granting summary
judgment against him in his employment discrimination action
against United Parcel Service, Incorporated. Finding no error, we
affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.