Joseph Blackburn, Sr v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Incorporated

05-2030Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 20, 2005

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2030
JOSEPH BLACKBURN, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
HOECHST MARION ROUSSEL, INCORPORATED; LEDERLE,
INCORPORATED,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior
District Judge. (CA-04-65-2)
Submitted: December 15, 2005 Decided: December 20, 2005
Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Blackburn, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Tamela Jane White, Craig
A. Komorowski, FARRELL, FARRELL & FARRELL, L.C., Huntington, West
Virginia; Jeff Chandler Woods, JACKSON KELLY, P.L.L.C., Charleston,
West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Blackburn, Sr., appeals a district court judgment
dismissing his complaint as barred by the statute of limitations.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and
affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See
Blackburn v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc., No. CA-04-65-2 (N.D.W.
Va. Aug. 24, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.