The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-2027•Martha Huser v. Antonelli, Terry, Stout & Kraus, Llp
05-2027Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 16, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2027
MARTHA HUSER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ANTONELLI, TERRY, STOUT & KRAUS, LLP,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District
Judge. (CA-04-1452)
Submitted: February 3, 2006 Decided: March 16, 2006
Before TRAXLER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Martha Huser, Appellant Pro Se. Charles G. Aschmann, Jr., ASCHMANN
& ASCHMANN, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Martha Huser appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing her civil action alleging employment discrimination and
denying her motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. See Huser v. Antonelli, No.
CA-04-1452 (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 3, 2005 & entered Aug. 5, 2005;
filed Aug. 8, 2005 & entered Aug. 12, 2005). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.