In re: John S. Breen; Teresa J. Breen

05-2010Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 25, 2006

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2010
IN RE: JOHN S. BREEN; TERESA J. BREEN,
Debtors.
--------------------------------
JOHN S. BREEN; TERESA J. BREEN,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
BALTMORE GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
ZVI GUTTMAN,
Trustee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA-
05-156-RDB; BK-02-58017; AP-02-5817)
Submitted: May 18, 2006 Decided: May 25, 2006
Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
John S. Breen; Teresa J. Breen, Appellants Pro Se. John Douglas
Burns, THE BURNS LAW FIRM, L.L.C., Greenbelt, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
John S. Breen and Teresa J. Breen appeal from the
district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order
dismissing their complaint filed against Baltimore Gas & Electric
alleging violations of the automatic stay in their bankruptcy
proceeding. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Breen v. Baltimore Gas & Elec. Co., Nos. CA-05-
156-RDB; BK-02-58017; AP-02-5817 (D. Md. Aug. 3, 2005). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.