052006.U

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2006
GERALDINE TALLEY HOBBY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BENEFICIAL/HOUSEHOLD MEMBER HSBC GROUP;
GLASSER AND GLASSER LAW FIRM,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 05-2007
GERALDINE TALLEY HOBBY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF LOGAN PARK, Logan Park
Group Corporation; GEORGE PASTOR GEORGE
SPICER; MRS. SPICER; RENEE CRANDALL BAKER;
MICHAEL BAKER, Deacon; UNKNOWN, An unknown
party who attended the sale and any additional
parties who were involved in the acquisition
of my family property, for the purpose of
demolishing for a parking lot - namely
Trustees,
Defendants - Appellees.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
No. 05-2008
GERALDINE TALLEY HOBBY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BENEFICIAL; CITY OF NORFOLK, City Attorney;
THE NORFOLK PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM; DIVISION OF
NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION; FIRE MARSHALL
DIVISION; DEPARTMENT OF UTILITIES, Division of
Water Accounts; TITUSTOWN CIVIC LEAGUE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (CA-05-238-JBF-TEM; CA-05-247-JBF-TEM; CA-05-274-JBF-FBS)
Submitted: May 18, 2006 Decided: May 25, 2006
Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Geraldine Talley Hobby, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Geraldine Hobby seeks to
appeal from the district court’s orders denying her motions to
proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing her civil actions for
failure to state a claim, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Hobby v. Beneficial Household No. CA-05-238-JBF-TEM;
Hobby v. First Baptist Church, No. CA-05-247-JBF-TEM, Hobby v.
Beneficial, No. CA-05-274-JBF-FBS (E.D. Va. Aug. 12, 2005). We
grant Hobby’s motions to amend and file her informal brief out of
time and deny her motion to transfer and for appointment of
counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --