The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-1964•Barry Green, Jr v. WILLIAM K. SUTER, Clerk
05-1964Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 10, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1964
BARRY GREEN, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM K. SUTER, Clerk; CLAYTON R. HIGGINS,
JR.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (CA-05-1674-3)
Submitted: January 31, 2006 Decided: February 10, 2006
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Barry Green, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Barry Green, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing
his civil action without prejudice. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See Green v. Suter, No. CA-05-
1674-3 (D.S.C. Aug. 18, 2005). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.