Sherry White-Battle v. Democratic Party of Virginia

05-1932Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 20, 2005

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1932
SHERRY WHITE-BATTLE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF VIRGINIA; NORFOLK CITY
DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE; GEORGE SCHAEFER; NORFOLK
ELECTORAL BOARD,
Defendants - Appellees,
--------------------------------------------------
ELISA LONG, General Registrar of the City of
Norfolk; EILEEN M. ADDISON,
Movants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (CA-03-897-2)
Submitted: December 15, 2005 Decided: December 20, 2005
Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Sherry White-Battle, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Edward Heretick,
FIRST VIRGINIA BANK BUILDING, Portsmouth, Virginia; Robert Bryan
Rigney, A. Christopher Zaleski, PROTOGYROU & RIGNEY, PLC, Norfolk,
Virginia; Samuel Lawrence Dumville, NORRIS & ST. CLAIR, PC,
Virginia Beach, Virginia; Melvin Wayne Ringer, CITY ATTORNEY’S
OFFICE, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Sherry White-Battle appeals the district court’s order
denying her second motion to amend her complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See White-Battle v.
Democratic Party of Virginia, No. CA-03-897-2 (E.D. Va. July 29,
2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.