The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-1922•Precious Okereke v. CHARLES A. MOYE, JR., United States District Court for the District of Georgia
05-1922Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 28, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1922
PRECIOUS OKEREKE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CHARLES A. MOYE, JR., United States District
Court for the District of Georgia,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis III, District
Judge. (CA-05-526)
Submitted: December 22, 2005 Decided: December 28, 2005
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Precious Okereke, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Precious Okereke appeals the district court’s August 4,
2005 order denying her “Second Motion for Three-Judge Court,”
construed as a motion for reconsideration pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.
P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Okereke v. Moye, No. CA-05-526 (E.D. Va. Aug.
4, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.