The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-1894•Gwendolyn Archibald v. Tidewater Community College
05-1894Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 7, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1894
GWENDOLYN ARCHIBALD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
TIDEWATER COMMUNITY COLLEGE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior
District Judge. (CA-04-489-2)
Submitted: February 17, 2006 Decided: March 7, 2006
Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gwendolyn Archibald, Appellant Pro Se. Martha Murphey Parrish,
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Gwendolyn Archibald appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to her employer on her claims of race
discrimination and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2 & 2000e-3 (2000). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See
Archibald v. Tidewater Community College, No. CA-04-489-2 (E.D. Va.
July 15, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.