The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-1891•Marianne Sawicki v. Morgan State University
05-1891Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 1, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1891
MARIANNE SAWICKI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY; EARL S. RICHARDSON;
CLARA I. ADAMS; BURNEY J. HOLLIS; OTTO BEGUS;
STATE OF MARYLAND,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District
Judge. (CA-03-1600-1-WMN)
Submitted: January 25, 2006 Decided: March 1, 2006
Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marianne Sawicki, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,
Attorney General, Dawna Marie Cobb, Mark Jason Davis, Assistant
Attorneys General, David Reid Moore, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Marianne Sawicki appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment for Morgan State University and
dismissing her claims of employment discrimination. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Sawicki v.
Morgan State Univ., No. CA-03-1600-1-WMN (D. Md. Aug. 2, 2005). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.