The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-1877•051877.U
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1877
HANNIBAL NGANGA WANGUHU,
Petitioner,
versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals. (A79-513-031)
Submitted: May 17, 2006 Decided: June 6, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bokwe G. Mofor, Silver Spring, Maryland, for Petitioner. Rod J.
Rosenstein, United States Attorney, John W. Sippel, Jr., Assistant
United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Hannibal Nganga Wanguhu, a native and citizen of Kenya,
seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
(Board) denying his motion to reopen and reconsider removal
proceedings. We have reviewed the administrative record and
conclude that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying
Wanguhu’s motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (b) (2006).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the
reasons stated by the Board. See In Re: Wanguhu, No. A79-513-031
(B.I.A. Jul. 26, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.