The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-1875•Arnulfo O. Labasbas v. Ratan Kumar
05-1875Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 8, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1875
ARNULFO O. LABASBAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RATAN KUMAR,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District
Judge. (CA-05-592-1)
Submitted: January 20, 2006 Decided: February 8, 2006
Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arnulfo O. Labasbas, Appellant Pro Se. Jerome Peyser Friedlander,
II, FRIEDLANDER, FRIEDLANDER & EARMAN, PC, McLean, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Arnulfo O. Labasbas appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil action alleging negligence, fraud, and
racketeering claims under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and (b)(6). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Labasbas v. Kumar, No. CA-05-592-1 (E.D. Va. filed July 8, 2005 &
entered July 12, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.