The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-1846•Susan T. Myer v. Carolyn Boose
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1846
SUSAN T. MYER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CAROLYN BOOSE; UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS; JAMES
COOKE, JR., individually and in his official
capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (CA-04-258-5)
Submitted: August 9, 2006 Decided: August 25, 2006
Before NIEMEYER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Susan T. Myer, Appellant Pro Se. Bryce Denman Neier, LAW OFFICE OF
BRYCE D. NEIER, Fayetteville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Susan T. Myer appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing her civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction
and denying her motion to alter or amend the judgment. Myer’s
federal complaint has its genesis in a real estate sale that was
part of state divorce and equitable distribution proceedings. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Myer v. Cooke, No. CA-04-258-5 (E.D.N.C. June 29, 2005).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.