The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-1838•In re: Otto Claude Smith; Linda C. Smith
05-1838Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 28, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1838
In Re: OTTO CLAUDE SMITH; LINDA C. SMITH,
Debtors.
------------------------------------------
OTTO CLAUSE SMITH; LINDA C. SMITH,
Debtors - Appellants,
versus
CROWFIELDS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,
Creditor - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg,
District Judge. (CA-05-80-1; BK-03-11127)
Submitted: December 22, 2005 Decided: December 28, 2005
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Otto Claude Smith and Linda C. Smith, Appellants Pro Se. Douglas
James Tate, MCGUIRE, WOOD & BISSETTE, PA, Asheville, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Otto Claude Smith and Linda C. Smith appeal from the
district court’s order denying their motion for reconsideration of
the district court’s order dismissing as untimely their appeal from
the bankruptcy court’s order. Our review of the record and the
opinions below discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Smith v.
Crowfields, Nos. CA-05-80-1; BK-03-11127 (W.D.N.C. June 20, 2005).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.