The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-1829•Shirley Phull v. Interstate Management Company, LLC
05-1829Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 23, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1829
SHIRLEY PHULL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
INTERSTATE MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District
Judge. (CA-04-1536-1)
Submitted: February 28, 2006 Decided: March 23, 2006
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Elaine C. Bredehoft, Peter C. Cohen, CHARLSON, BREDEHOFT & COHEN,
P.C., Reston, Virginia, for Appellant. Michael A. Viccora, Susan
Jeanblanc Cohen, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Shirley Phull appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on her civil action alleging claims of employment
discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Phull v. Interstate Mgmt. Co., No. CA-04-1536-1 (E.D. Va. July 8,
2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.