The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-1826•Robert S. Reynolds v. MARK WARNER, Honorable, Governor of Commonwealth of Virginia
05-1826Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 28, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1826
ROBERT S. REYNOLDS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MARK WARNER, Honorable, Governor of
Commonwealth of Virginia,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
MEDICAL COLLEGE OF VIRGINIA, Auxiliary of
Virginia Commonwealth University Health
System; RETREAT HOSPITAL, INCORPORATED,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District
Judge. (CA-05-349)
Submitted: February 23, 2006 Decided: February 28, 2006
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert S. Reynolds, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Michael Hall, Judith
Williams Jagdmann, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA,
Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Robert S. Reynolds appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
deny Reynolds’ motion for an en banc hearing and affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Reynolds v. Warner, No.
CA-05-349 (E.D. Va. June 23, 2005). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.