Ted A. McCracken v. Daniel Patrick Fass

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1818
TED A. MCCRACKEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DANIEL PATRICK FASS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (CA-05-298-5-BO)
Submitted: December 15, 2005 Decided: December 20, 2005
Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ted A. McCracken, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Ted A. McCracken appeals the district court’s dismissal
of his civil action alleging defamation, retaliation, malicious
prosecution, and intentional infliction of emotional distress and
imposition of a pre-filing injunction. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See McCracken v. Fass, No. 05-
298-5-BO (E.D.N.C. June 22, 2005). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --