The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-1792•John Crew v. United States Postal Service
05-1792Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 20, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1792
JOHN CREW,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE; JOHN E. POTTER,
Postmaster General,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (CA-05-156-1)
Submitted: October 18, 2005 Decided: October 20, 2005
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Crew, Appellant Pro Se. R. Joseph Sher, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
John Crew appeals the district court’s order denying his
civil claim alleging employment discrimination. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Crew v. United
States Postal Serv., No. CA-05-156-1 (E.D. Va. filed June 17, 2005
& entered June 21, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.