Kess Tani v. SALOMON BROTHERS REALTY CORPORATION/CITIGROUP, President

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1711
KESS TANI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SALOMON BROTHERS REALTY CORPORATION/CITIGROUP,
President and CEO; BRUCE WILLIAMS, President
and CEO, C-Bass; FRIEDMAN AND MACFAYDEN, Law
Firm; ALVIN E. FRIEDMAN, P.A., Trustee;
KENNETH J. MACFAYDEN; DANIEL MENCHEL, Trustee;
JAMES J. LOFTUS, Trustee; MICHAEL T. CANTRELL,
Partner, Law Firm of Friedman & MacFayden,
Defendants - Appellees.
and
DEBRA LYMAN, Assistant Vice President, Salomon
Brothers Realty Corporation/CitiGroup; LARRY
LITTON, President and CEO, Litton Loan
Servicing, LP; LELA DEROUEN, Assistant Vice
President, Litton Loan Servicing, LP; STEVE
DRODDY, Mortgage Analyst, Litton Loan
Servicing, LP,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA-
03-2566-CCB)
Submitted: November 22, 2005 Decided: December 1, 2005

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kess Tani, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth John MacFayden, Michael
Thomas Cantrell, FRIEDMAN & MACFAYDEN, PC, Baltimore, Maryland;
Jeffrey Barry Fisher, Traci Y. Gray, GIORDANO, BUSH, VILLAREALE &
VAUGHAN, PA, Upper Marlboro, Maryland; Martin Stuart Goldberg, THE
FISHER LAW GROUP, Upper Marlboro, Maryland; Gregg Edward Viola,
ECCLESTON & WOLF, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Kess Tani appeals from the district court’s orders
granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants in his action in
which he asserted violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices
Act and other claims arising from the Defendants’ initiation of
foreclosure proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinions and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
Tani v. Lyman, No. CA-03-2566-CCB (D. Md. Nov. 29, 2004; filed
Mar. 2, 2005 & entered Mar. 3, 2005; May 31, 2005). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --