The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
05-1669•Mark A. Ward v. PETER E. MALONEY, Plan Administrator for Lin Television Corporation
05-1669Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 20, 2005
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1669
MARK A. WARD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PETER E. MALONEY, Plan Administrator for Lin
Television Corporation,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District
Judge. (CA-03-1170-1)
Submitted: December 15, 2005 Decided: December 20, 2005
Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark A. Ward, Appellant Pro Se. William McCardell Furr, Andrew R.
Fox, WILLCOX & SAVAGE, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Mark A. Ward appeals the district court judgment granting
Peter Maloney’s motion for a judgment on the pleadings. We have
reviewed the record and the district court memorandum opinion and
affirm for the reasons of the district court. See Ward v. Maloney,
CA-03-1170-1 (M.D.N.C. May 17, 2005). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.